61 total replies (3 pages)
|
||||
|
61 total replies (3 pages)
|
||||
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
Isn´t stuff good the way they are now i mean sure i understand if you guys dont want this to be a porn site.But it isn´t and lesbian penetration is what i consider not that much porn.It is still porn but not as much as male/female penetration.So that is what i think do we really have to ´´mess´´ with things that are working good.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
Isn´t stuff good the way they are now i mean sure i understand if you guys dont want this to be a porn site.But it isn´t and lesbian penetration is what i consider not that much porn.It is still porn but not as much as male/female penetration.So that is what i think do we really have to ´´mess´´ with things that are working good. Lesbian penetration might not be as hardcore as male to female penetration (or female to male penetration, whatever floats your boat), but let's face it, that doesn't make it a wallpaper, it's still fap material to a certain extent. And, in the end, this is a wallpaper website, not a porn website.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
People these days have no knowledge of nude art and mistake it for porn and other crap.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
People these days have no knowledge of nude art and mistake it for porn and other crap. I can relate to that, most people don't know the difference, it seems... "OH, TITS, IT'S PORN, IT'S PORN, YOU CREEP GET AWAY FROM ME!!!" People need to learn the difference.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
People these days have no knowledge of nude art and mistake it for porn and other crap. i completely agree. Some photographers who chose to get some nudity art are puted in same schetch than pornographic photographers. About the topic itself, i dont see any problem about Gay or lesbian pentration.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
I am not sure if this has already been mentioned before somewhere else, but can't there be a XXX category where EVERY kind of sexual act goes in and which CANNOT be activated for viewing unless you're a registered member?
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
That is already the case; NSFW images are viewable by members ONLY (unless a member gives a non-member a direct link to the image)
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
Two of the images I have just uploaded that I have tagged heterosexual. Just keeping you informed incase someone just decides to delete it saying it's 'porn'.
 2592x3456  1920x2560
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
I personally don't have anything against female/female penetration, but I understand some can get annoyed/disturbed. On the other hand I usually delete strap-ons and fistings. For me right there is the line that separates softcore and hardcore in this subject.
Let's wait till the poll gets more votes and we will decide what to do on this topic.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
Just an FYI, anyone who's interested over the debate of porn vs. artistic nudity and is interested in some reading material can have a look at this thread:
http://wallbase.cc/forum/topic/1518/ Also... 
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
I personally don't have anything against female/female penetration, but I understand some can get annoyed/disturbed. On the other hand I usually delete strap-ons and fistings. For me right there is the line that separates softcore and hardcore in this subject. what about stuff like this? penetration but not lesbianism. http://wallbase.cc/wallpaper/1942860
Naked women? fine. But who the f*ck wants a penetration as wallpaper? It doesn't matter whether it is male/male, female/female or male/female. There is plenty of porn for you people all over the web. Wallbase should be a wallpapers site. Not a high resolution porn pics site.
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
Makes me want a feature that shows the gender of profiles.
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
Naked women? fine. But who the f*ck wants a penetration as wallpaper? It doesn't matter whether it is male/male, female/female or male/female. There is plenty of porn for you people all over the web. Wallbase should be a wallpapers site. Not a high resolution porn pics site. Come on. You can't say what people like or not. Maybe you don't want a penetration pic as wallpaper (me too), but I'm sure there are other people who have penetration pics as wallpaper. The likes and dislikes of people are so different, you can't tell wether something is pretty or ugly.
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
Makes me want a feature that shows the gender of profiles. Seconded
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
Thing is, as long as there's any kind of penetration, there are going to be folks annoyed at the equality of which combinations of genders get penetration images on the site or not. WB already has plenty of erotica and a reputation as a stealthy porn site is not great, since (needless to say) it's a wallpaper site.
Since pornography is just any sexually explicit material and artistic merit is subjective, I don't think it's worth arguing about what is artistic or not. Some people see any naked woman as art and others feel uncomfortable just at the sight of a vagina, so maybe "no penetration at all" is a compromise. It means some folks get their high-res pics of flesh (can't blame them) and the other folks can feel sure knowing that WB isn't one big porn dump (can't really blame them either).
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
Disallowing penetration would be idiotic. If somebody doesn't want to look at wallpapers containing penetration, they don't have to, but they will be there for the people who do want to. If they are disallowed, then the people who do want to look at them can't, and it changes nothing for the people who don't want to. Every wallpaper you view on this website is at your own leisure, and you're not forced to look at anything you don't want to.
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
thats not a bad idea at all.
Well I am surprised that there is some users who have a problem with the "porn" wallpapers...
I have another idea: what about making a new FLAG - for all penetration and others.. the present nsfw will be just for naked girls and other soft erotic  I just want to say that wallbase without these http://wallbase.cc/wallpaper/1942860 wouldn't be WALLBASE :) And who is talking about puting these pictures at desktop... for me wallbase is a site with HQ pictures 
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
I am not offended by porn; I'm a girl and I used to watch porn. And, that's right, I cannot tell you what you should like, but anyone who uses actual porn (not talking about nude art, erotic images, etc) as a wallpaper does have a problem.
I am not offended by porn; I'm a girl and I used to watch porn. And, that's right, I cannot tell you what you should like, but anyone who uses actual porn (not talking about nude art, erotic images, etc) as a wallpaper does have a problem. Moron.
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
I am not offended by porn; I'm a girl and I used to watch porn. And, that's right, I cannot tell you what you should like, but anyone who uses actual porn (not talking about nude art, erotic images, etc) as a wallpaper does have a problem. people are free to use whatever they want as a wallpaper, why do you care?
Written 11 months 2 weeks ago
As rude and 'moronic'
 Lola12 comments might be, let's be more patient towards her guys as she is new on WB. She needs to spend time reading the numerous discussions that have taken place about this topic on other threads and then patiently think about it.
I'll preface this honestly by saying I don't understand why anyone over 16 would want porn on their desktop wallpaper. However, different strokes for different folks. I immediately see that there is likely to be a quality issue as I can only imagine the things that people will try to pass off as a wallpaper. I don't really care, though, as long as everything is flagged appropriately and I don't have to dig through it! That's the great thing about a site with a good category system.
|
fanér22
quote
amahran
fanér22
AbstractART
AbstractART
etesor
LWTBP
Yotoon
Yotoon
TheBarnman
Lola12
Lord Anemoi
LWTBP
Prime
Lord Anemoi
Letis
enormhi