61 total replies (3 pages)
|
||||
|
61 total replies (3 pages)
|
||||
|
POLL
multiple selection: OFF
SHould lesbian penetrations be disallowed?
I think it's a given that WB will be home to a lot of 'porny' stuff and nothing can be done about it except in keeping the hardcore stuff away, WHICH is what I like too.
However, when looking at  1600x1058 it struck me how there is a serious lack of adult images that contain male-female scenarios. I mean, either the consensus is that anything to do with a naked man and woman is considered too taboo for WB or people seem to worried of uploading stuff like that.I think it's unfair that if images like the one shown above are fine for WB, then why not some 'straight action'? I know there are 1000's of classy images that fit this criteria. Pardon me if this has been discussed before. 
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
Male female penetration is banned here, most lesbian porn is considered softcore so we allow it but we are not a porn site. We have nudes and soft images but no hardcore is allowed here.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
Male female penetration is banned here, most lesbian porn is considered softcore so we allow it but we are not a porn site. We have nudes and soft images but no hardcore is allowed here. There are still some pictures with penetration that persist on the site. And I think lesbian fingering and fisting should be banned the same way. Just my two cents.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
I am not talking about penetration. But if that IS the issue, what about pics with girls licking each other down there... would it be allowed if a man was doing the licking?
And a man making love to a woman in the nude doesn't have to be hardcore. As I said in my OP, I am only CURIOUS and wouldn't want a huge fight erupting again. I am sure it's not co-incidence that there is a serious lack of straight NSFW images on Wallbase! I am not talking about penetration. But if that IS the issue, what about pics with girls licking each other down there... would it be allowed if a man was doing the licking? Some people consider lesbianism an art, as do I up to a certain extent, so I think lesbianism is fine, but people abuse that to upload some pretty hardcore lesb-walls, which mods can't do anything about, unfortunately (or rather, they can't be assed). I think there really has to be a limit as to what lesb-walls can contain, which could definitely taboo bodily fluids, but then again, I'm just the pathetic lowly user, does my opinion really matter to anyone?
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
   I would consider ALL three to be erotic art if not JUST ART! And I can't remember the last time I saw an image like that on Wallbase.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
I think that if you open the door to any kind of VISIBILE INTERCOURSE, things will begin to get very strange (and very disgusting) at Wallbase.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
I think that if you open the door to any kind of VISIBILE INTERCOURSE, things will begin to get very strange (and very disgusting) at Wallbase. I agree things would get pretty odd very fast.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
It seems like LWTBP isn't really asking about straight porn images, but more like male/female erotic photos. I don't really care about it myself, but I don't see how softcore images of men and women together breaks the rules. If pictures of any number of women penetrating each other with god knows what, while giving rim jobs is alright, artful straight nudes should be far from a violation.
Though my second answer to the request would be to quote Ghandi, "Be the change you wish to see..." If there is a type of wallpaper you are interested in, find examples and post them. You never know, as many members as there are, there are bound to be more like you just waiting to see that it's okay to post it. Though my second answer to the request would be to quote Ghandi, "Be the change you wish to see..." If there is a type of wallpaper you are interested in, find examples and post them. You never know, as many members as there are, there are bound to be more like you just waiting to see that it's okay to post it. That makes a lot of sense!
lol @ Gandhi quote.
@OP: I would allow the third pic. But preggo 'nude art' can open a can of worms and so can the first one, even though there is no visible penetration. On a serious note though, I do agree that lesbianism is usually considered softcore and hence allowed, but also that penetration (whether lesbian or solo) with a dildo or veggie or any other object is also hardcore and should be restricted. I have said this before, but more than a few users, and most of the mods, and most importantly  Yotoon should agree with this so that it is made effective and enforced.But again, there is the issue of what is hardcore being a subjective thing in itself. So it is difficult to disallow one type of lesbianism and disallow another without alienating a certain section of users. But anyway, lets have a poll on whether lesbian penetration should be disallowed and if enough users agree, maybe it will be enforced. I would say at least a 100 Yes votes.
Well, if it comes down to that, I think all NSFW wallpapers STRICTLY excluding penetration (be it lebianism, hetero, or just plain solo) should be allowed.
Penetration would thus include any fingers, arms, penis, dildos, or anything phallic. I think cunnilingus should be allowed though, unless it's just begging for a fap. Okay:  1920x1080  1919x1080  1920x1080  1366x768  1920x1080  1920x1080 Not okay: http://wallbase.cc/wallpaper/1566489 http://wallbase.cc/wallpaper/936834  1920x1080  1920x1080 http://wallbase.cc/wallpaper/1847690 http://wallbase.cc/wallpaper/1959404 We can go into bodily fluids, but I guess that'll come up at a later time.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
The 'not okay' section of images would still have good amount of supporters you know.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
But if we let that pass, in lezboyd's words, that can open a can of worms.
Let's face it, you're most probably not using that as a wallpaper, and this is a wallpaper website, not a porn website Even if some people use straight-out pornography as wallpapers, they're a minority (let's face it, those that use NSFW wallpapers themselves are a minority, let alone those that use pornographic walls), so a decision like that can appeal to the majority. On a related side-note, there are users that only visit wallbase for the pornographic walls so they can fap. Isn't that something... 
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
The point you are making is all over the place! Just vote, please! So far those against change + cba are greater in number.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
 amahran how are the 'okay' ones even related to lesbians? by your definition, these should be some okay ones:  1280x951  1680x1050  3000x1875
Yeah, that's fine by my standard, and I was giving a broader view of NSFW non-penetration vs. penetration, since that's what's got admins on their toes.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
The point you are making is all over the place! Just vote, please! So far those against change + cba are greater in number. Well then add a new option that says "if lesbian penetration is OK should male/female penetration also be allowed?"
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
NO!!!
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
I agree; allowing male=>female penetration is just opening a door to trouble AND to wallbase turning into a porn website (which I doubt is Yotoon's objective)
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
Yes I agree to that. But that doesn't mean just because majority polls are saying lesbian penetration is fine that THAT should be allowed. But well... this wasn't the aim of my thread if you guys remember.
Yes I agree to that. But that doesn't mean just because majority polls are saying lesbian penetration is fine that THAT should be allowed. But well... this wasn't the aim of my thread if you guys remember. The original aim of the thread was questioning why there aren't any straight nsfw walls, which we already answered from the first post. Now it's just about questioning the implementation of a possible new rule. My idea of what can solve the problem is a rule that simply dejects penetration of any sort, just my 2 cents.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
Putting aside the bias about woman-woman or man-man stuff, I thought the rule was something like /s/ where no penises are allowed in the image, and no penetration. Obviously penetration means the penis, but then fingers and tongues are still penetrating in pics like that, then it becomes not hardcore but not softcore either. If it's up for discussion then maybe it should be only nudity, but not explicit sexual acts like masturbation/oral? What I mean is something like SG, which seems to be almost 100% just shots of girls posing, nothing more, you know?
Really there is too much bias, I think. I know a lot of guys enjoy some girl on girl but very, very few like guy on guy, so keeping it nudes only, no sexual interaction, makes it (hopefully) simple, and fair. I've seen some people get pretty homophobic here, or calling WB homophobic for only allowing lesbianism. I'm talking about a compromise so less people get mad and the rules are clearer. Some people obviously use WB to dump porn so it can't be good for reputation if the rules are lax or vague.
Written 11 months 3 weeks ago
There is nothing inherently wrong with penetration. The fact is that any penetration featuring males is considered taboo, while any featuring strictly women isn't. It's a biased, sexist, and subjective view, but it works.
There is nothing inherently wrong with penetration. The fact is that any penetration featuring males is considered taboo, while any featuring strictly women isn't. It's a biased, sexist, and subjective view, but it works. He already said the most of what i wanted to say so i'm just gonna "^Second that" comment  EDIT: I Voted to leave the lesbians alone, and allow the penetraiton... i do miss male-female penetration, but that's considered "hardcore" so without lesbians i'd have nothing but boobs  |
LWTBP
quote
Mustard
Mustard
LWTBP
Trahenots
Trahenots
koalafishy
koalafishy
Epic Man ... Philip